I was holded in custody on ****,2013. The police's telephone number is (81)011-****. But this time doesn't relate with my administrative litigation. It was that I jumped to s conclusion if my suit shelved again. Thought I can understand about them in custody,a judicial police officer;TAMOTSU Toshiya tried me to be sign a written an inquiry record on a blank sheet of paper. Mr.TAMOTSU tried to forge. Forthermore,they hospitalized to tied arms,legs and stomach on the bed as a mental patient all day at *** hospital I was under confinement for 5days locked from outside.The hospital's telephone is (81)011-***-****.a name card in the webpage is a nuse and a psychiatric social workers:***MURA ***ichi.I'd like to see Japan Post'site:https://trackings.post.japanpost.jp/services/srv/search/input?locale=en I can prove what I sued them about anothe case just ***days. You have to imput 12711***550 and 12*****19430. You can understand to accused the polices. It was that I jumped to s conclusion if my suit shelved again about 1271*****550 sent on ***,2013. My protest toward a policeman who don't known reason connected my arrest. The whole story was preserved my degitalcamera movie and IC recorder. The only IC Recorder and the degitalcamera was refused from the police except SD card memory. But the TAMOTSU Toshiya's written complaint did,either. Then,I sent about TAMOTSU Toshiya's letter complaints to the Sapporo public prosecutor's office. I have the similer judicial precedent with mycase.The URL is http://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=33874&hanreiKbn=04 But it can't see the documents in English.Thought an adult man refused to go to a mental hospital,it's the case forced to the one in a hypnotic by a public servant permitted from his parents. This is the case occerd in 2003.
Though I accused the police;Toshiya TAMOTSU,A public prosecutor;Ms.Miyuki TAMAI dismissed my written complaint.Though I demanded to notify not to prosecute in a well-grounded document,The documents was written in a groundless document legally. The return didn't exist legally. They offen send the return not to demand a procedure legally.
The Sapporo district court dismissed my judge accompanying claim.
Though I demanded a police man;Toshiya TAMOTSU,The district court assertted that I demanded a prosecuter;Miyuki TAMAI.They asserted that I mistaked one to demand.then,they were dismissed my demand.It's non-sense.
Though I added the similar judicial precedent with my case at the Supreme court, The Sapporo high court dismissed my judge accompanying claim,either.
Though I got the similer judicial precedent with mycase at the Supreme court,this site can't search in English.
This similer judicial precedent with mycase at the Supreme court can get in Japanese.URL ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=70299&hanreiKbn=02The PDF is [js_201003191324454134038],and another one ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=59193&hanreiKbn=02The PDF is [js_20100319125707521388].Though I added this similer one at the Sapporo high court,they dismissed my protest.
Though I added the similar judicial precedent with my case at the Supreme court, The Supreme court dismissed my judge accompanying claim,either. They ignored the similar judicial precedent with my case calmly.
The police safety commission dismissed my claim not to indicate the reason. But I have some judicial precedents to indicate the reason. But these can't get the court precedents inJapanese. The URL ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=63288&hanreiKbn=02The file number is js_20100319122544597054.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=53760&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319121743518219.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=57600&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319124359372590.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=70171&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319132425043663.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=57080&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319124112289331.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=53215&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319121406882412.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=51877&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319120345062677.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=52025&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319120443937207.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=53215&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319121406882412.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=53777&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319121748058252.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=57080&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319124112289331.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=66902&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319131858964017.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=55976&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319123034030784.pdf.And another precedent ishttp://www.courts.go.jp/search/jhsp0030?hanreiid=57628&hanreiKbn=02.The PDF number is js_20100319124406848266.pdf.
Mr.Kunio HATOYAMA denied my claim.This chairman decided to not punish they,judges;Manabu KATO,Shynsaku O^KUBO,Mami SETO, Ryu^ko SKURAI,Seiji KANECHIKU,Yu^ko^YOKOTA,Isao SHIRAKI,Yoshiki YAMAURA.
They had always indicated a lied law in the enclosed document. The Clause 3 of Article 10 of the law impeach judges doesn't mean that "The decided reason may not indicate".There is the law that the chairman have to indicate the reason in Article 33 of the law impeach judges. They are a childish lie. They may intend what Russian roulette game is to not install a bullet.
Though I didn't demand compensation yet,the district court demanded me a correction. They must be eager me to confuse about the defendant name. Besause they have cheated me 2 decades ago,either.
The district court denied my petition not to indicate about the compansation that the presiding judge,himself proposed. His proposal about the defendant must doubted a trap to be changed the defendant name. This case is defferent from Hokkaido public safety commission and Hokkaidou governer.That's why. The compansation is Hokkaido governer. And the defendant to cancel is Hokkaido public safety commission.
The high court denied my petition not to indicate about the compansation that the presiding judge,himself proposed. His proposal about the defendant must doubted a trap to be changed the defendant name. This case is defferent from Hokkaido public safety commission and Hokkaidou governer.That's why. The compansation is Hokkaido governer. And the defendant to cancel is Hokkaido public safety commission. I must guess that they was dissatisfied with my right defendant name. Japan as child's country.
I sent The Sapporo Comitte for Inquest of Prosecution. But the clerk,Makoto KAZAKAMI assarted not to send to the Public Prosecutor's Qualification's Examination committee. I asked twice. I demanded to send to be based on the article 40 of the Act on Comittee for Inquest of Prosecution. The yang man asaaerted not to send the one. This decision must be a forge.
I sent The Sapporo Comitte for Inquest of Prosecution. But the clerk,Makoto KAZAKAMI assarted not to send to the Public Prosecutor's Qualification's Examination committee. I asked twice. I demanded to send to be based on the article 40 of the Act on Comittee for Inquest of Prosecution. The yang man asaaerted not to send the one. This decision must be a forge.
